data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e749/6e749d9943d627ee427f0c0add44bc908d7eb02f" alt=""
Will the noise_step method hold up in 6 months?
A new method for training neural networks, called noise_step, has gained traction on Twitter. The core innovation is that it purportedly allows neural networks to be trained using 1.58-bit precision instead of the standard f16 precision.
You can explore more about noise_step through the following links:
Twitter announcement: https://x.com/_brickner/status/1871348156786704657
This market resolves YES if, within six months:
A model with at least 100 million parameters is successfully trained using noise_step at 1.58-bit precision,
With verifiable results that align with the original claims (e.g., comparable or better performance than f16-based training).
The market resolves NO if:
The method is debunked,
Demonstrated to be ineffective,
Or if no verifiable evidence of its success on a model of the specified size emerges within the time frame.