What Will Happen During Trump's Second Term (2025-2029)?
➕
Plus
594
Ṁ220k
2029
14%
Ukraine controls any portion of Crimea for over a day
33%
Trump gives himself a nickname in third person
50%
Trump mentions "Top Trump(s)", "trump card(s)", "trumpet(s)", or "trump(ing)" (british slang for farting)
59%
Trump attempts to invoke Article 2 Section 3 to adjourn Congress
20%
US military deployed domestically against >=1 US citizen (variants of "Seal Team 6 the opposition")
34%
10% fewer government agencies
5%
Matt Gaetz is rejected by the Senate for Attorney General, then DeSantis appoints him to Rubio's vacated Senate seat
71%
Cannabis is removed from Schedule 1
17%
Cannabis is federally legalized
5%
Constitutional Amendment
89%
Republican lose a House seat in a special election
35%
Trump publicly approves of Project 2025, before 2026
86%
NOAA gets reduced, crippled, or privatized
83%
Amtrak gets reduced, crippled, or privatized
84%
FEMA gets reduced, crippled, or privatized
20%
John Thune out as Senate Majority Leader
77%
Trump makes a public statement about UFOs / UAPs
54%
Trump makes no public appearance for more than 21 consecutive days
79%
Trump makes no public appearances for more than 14 consecutive days
34%
A member of the Trump family runs for Congress

Add your own answers!

Unless otherwise specified:

  1. "Trump bans" refers to Trump or the US government, but actions, like "Trump says X" refers only to Trump. I expect the intent to be pretty clear. (If not, I reserve the right to modify the phrasing to make it clearer; ping me if you find an option unclear)

  1. "Trump" refers to the person that was president of the US in 2017-2021.

  2. If something is not known to have happened, unless otherwise specified, it would resolve NO. For example, the option "Trump gets COVID" resolves NO unless it is announced or sufficiently confirmed, despite the possibility that he gets covid without announcing it. The intent here is to resolve YES when the balance of evidence clearly indicates the option prediction happened.

I reserve the right to cancel any option that doesn't seem relevant / unconnected to trump / etc. If a question is ambiguous, please ping the question creator for clarification. If they don't clarify within a few days, ping me and I'll decide how it's disambiguated.

Consensus of credible reporting will be used for this market's resolution. I am not following Trump's every move so I'd very much appreciate @s when options need to be resolved.

Get Ṁ1,000 play money
Sort by:
NOAA gets reduced, crippled, or privatized

@KimberlyWilberLIgt what is the minimum threshold for being reduced? A single dollar lower budget? A single employee being let go?

bought Ṁ1 Matt Gaetz is reject... YES

@TheAllMemeingEye idk, I’ll defer to the market creator. I wanted to be broad because I expect institutions like these to be choked by indirect means - funding cuts, stripped of power to govern, reduced wages/pensions, etc - instead of dissolved via explicit EOs / congressional acts.

FEMA gets reduced, crippled, or privatized
bought Ṁ25 FEMA gets reduced, c... YES

@KimberlyWilberLIgt They need to be reduced the most of all the agencies listed here

@Yoae Hoping for a hurricane-free 2025 for you and your region :-)

10% fewer government agencies

@NivlacM https://www.usa.gov/agency-index

Wayback has an index of this page Nov 6. So if we see a significant decrease in agencies we can count and compare

Awww, this is too cute! Old guys are so cute. Does this look like the end of Democracy to you?

Military is about to get purged, but come on, got to love moments like this!

bought Ṁ5 Cannabis is removed ... NO

@Predictor I think an attempt at a military purge would immediately lead to a military coup

bought Ṁ40 Answer #AO89s8EIgE YES

Does Trump need to negotiate it personally? Or just someone in his administration?

@Undox you posted the same thing twice

i n/aed one of them, tried to be the later one but it was tough to tell on mobile

The only times this has happened this century were the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID lockdowns right? If so I'm surprised the odds are so high

https://www.worldometers.info/gdp/us-gdp/

bought Ṁ10 Answer #99tlnEN85d NO

Surprised this is at such high odds given how ridiculously high the bar to beat is (the unemployment spike at the start of the COVID lockdowns)

https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-unemployment-rate.htm

bought Ṁ25 Answer #99tlnEN85d NO

agreed and anyone who disagrees can buy shares from my limit order at 28%

Is that the record for this, or is it the 25% unemployment in the Great Depression?

Either way, it seems unlikely that we'll reach that level.

@Quillist you mean of all time presumably? or no

@NivlacM I don't want to dox you but I would have a preference for a reformulation of this question that isn't dependent on you sticking around to manifold for 4 years, so it could be like a specific walmart in your state / country, or a random one in the us, that has internet-available price quotations or something? It's not a huge deal so I'm fine with keeping it as is, but just voicing this preference in case you agree ig.

@Bayesian nah. If y'all can't get a hold of me in 2 years I trust y'all to resolve it reasonably. Otherwise it's the price of my milk 😡 currently $3.22 per gallon

@NivlacM Sounds good. Lmao

@TheAllMemeingEye working criteria: it's not visible on him in multiple consecutive well lit public appearances over multiple weeks

@dlin007 Does "a former Democratic presidential candidate" refer to (A) only the party's official presidential NOMINEE (i.e. Harris, H. Clinton, Obama, Kerry, Gore, B. Clinton, etc) — or (B) a candidate who was in the running for the Democratic nomination at some point in time (i.e. the above, but also Sanders, Warren, Buttigieg, etc)?

@PaintspotInfez the former, plus Dukakis