🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ2,089 | |
| 2 | Ṁ2,052 | |
| 3 | Ṁ290 | |
| 4 | Ṁ237 | |
| 5 | Ṁ114 |
@Joshua Cut the shit. I am awaiting a story of the shitty situations to be coming out about the shutdown. Unresolved immediately for my traders and followers, I know what I am doing here it is not the first rodeo for me here. This is the 🤡 behavior from you.
@Joshua Cut the shit. I am awaiting a story of the shitty situations to be coming out about the shutdown. Unresolved immediately for my traders and followers, I know what I am doing here it is not the first rodeo for me here. This is the 🤡 behavior from you.
I am furious feeling!!! Apologies for all traders here, this is the intervention from a mod @Joshua like the Trump sending national guard army men to the Portland. I have a sick feeling to my stomach. Logging off for a night, not happy about it and must hang in there emotionally for this all. 😢
@CryptoNeoLiberalist I thought trump sending the national guard to Portland would be a good thing, look at DC
@CryptoNeoLiberalist I will unresolve this market for you but only if you agree to three conditions:
The title needs some symbol, note, whatever, to show that this is not a "shutdown" market more clearly.
There must be a market description with at least some kind of warning to traders that they are trading at their own risk and (hopefully) some inkling of what the criteria are.
The market's tags/groups should include the 'Fun' tag or a similar tag that is used for nonsense markets.
For broader visibility: I was part of this discussion on discord, and support Eliza's approach here. I would support it for future similar markets, especially if they did this from creation. I think someone like this is the best balance I can see between "let people have fun" and "attempt to protect naive users".
@EvanDaniel I agree, but we all disagree with Joshua's premature misresolution without having read the comments where Giga made himself clear. Giga should probably have allowed the AI summaries to add his clarifications this time
Don't be a shit
@Joshua Gigacuking is active and by his jokes showed he didn't intend any misspelling interpretation that would prematurely resolve this YES.
@Joshua @mods If I am correct, the right thing to do now is either to N/A the market or to let @CryptoNeoLiberalist resolve it his own way.
@Joshua Also he laid out the criteria here:
"I am awaiting for the shitty story of the shutdown being the shitdown. A problem created by it first world or other. It is another level of the shutdown being the shitdown for the America's people and citizens." - Gigacuking
@ItsMe Ah lmao. It should still un-misresolve. I still find it likely that renegades among the mods bailed out The Official.
@Chumchulum I'm not bailing out anyone, this is just obviously dumb and should resolve in favor of anyone who misread the title and tried to bet on real world events
@Joshua if manifold had mod intervention on all "dumb markets" half of manifold would be wildly different
@Joshua Why would you ever want to protect traders who can't read? That just leads to inefficient markets.