White Lotus Season 3 [Mega independent]
➕
Plus
108
Ṁ110k
Dec 31
50%
Someone related to the original Greg/Gary-Tanya murder plot dies
59%
A hotel employee dies
34%
Someone from the girls trip dies
50%
Someone from the Ratliff family dies
59%
At least one death is accidental
60%
Poison is consumed by someone other than the poisoner's intended victim (or poisoning is completely accidental)
59%
Zion gets into an altercation with someone, or tries to physically protect someone else
69%
two people present at the White Lotus confirmed dead at the end of the finale
39%
A member of the Ratliff family finds out about the handy
20%
Frank overdoses
79%
Jim Hollinger is alive at season end
54%
Jim Hollinger talks to Chelsea
30%
Chelsea and Saxon are ~a romantic couple at season end
43%
Jaclyn or Kate make any comment about the quality of the sex with Valentin
43%
An angry Russian woman shows up at the White Lotus
53%
Kate, Laurie, and Jaclyn share a tender moment to smooth out the friction from their episode 7 argument
50%
Someone dies from eating the poisonous fruit in a protein shake in the blender
66%
Someone drinks or makes a poison smoothie
94%
Finale more than 70min long
19%
Ratliff family dies

What will happen in the third season of the HBO series White Lotus?

  • Update 2025-03-06 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Important criteria for resolution:

    • The event must involve physical interaction (not merely a kiss) with an immediate family member

    • The interaction must be a result of sexual attraction

  • Update 2025-03-13 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Full Frontal Male Nudity Clarification

    • The outcome is determined by whether the male genital is shown in its entirety.

    • The presence or absence of outer thighs is not relevant.

  • Update 2025-03-16 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Adultery Clarification:

    • Relationship Inclusion: Acts of adultery qualify if the individuals are in a relationship, not only in a legal marriage.

    • Examples: This clarification explicitly covers cases involving characters such as Jaclyn, Chloe, Chelsea, and their respective male counterparts.

  • Update 2025-03-18 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Electronics Theft Clarification:

    • The act must be committed in the spirit of stealing/breaking in (i.e. it is not enough if the subject only hides the act from their family).

    • If a family member is clearly present (as with Pam) during the act, it does not satisfy the intended criteria for covert removal.

  • Update 2025-03-28 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Handjob Clarification:

    • A handjob does not qualify as intercourse.

    • Only full sexual intercourse is considered toward meeting the outcome criteria.

  • Update 2025-03-30 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Named Characters Clarification:

    • Named characters are those whose names are mentioned explicitly during dialogue or who are central to the story.

    • Peripheral characters (e.g., bodyguards) do not count unless their names are referenced in the narrative.

Get Ṁ1,000 play money
Sort by:

some reason this one is still open?

Some great additions to this market, need to really think on them and evaluate before predicting!

Kate, Laurie, and Jaclyn share a tender moment to smooth out the friction from their episode 7 argument
bought Ṁ30 Kate, Laurie, and Ja... NO

@shankypanky 🤣 🤣 🤣

@ukaszBartoszcze why is this so high?

@jim because she has worn a Maggie Simpson necklace (I am not joking) https://www.reddit.com/r/WhiteLotusHBO/comments/1jmf150/chloe_is_the_shooter/

bought Ṁ50 Answer #2L0Q568CQz NO

Get your final predictions in, less than 1 week until the season finale!

(Flagging that I will watch this week's episode tomorrow, and respond to/resolve stuff after that. Might be "late" next week as well!)

Ratliff family dies

@Predictor no survivors?

@Odoacre None. Mama, papa bear, Buddha pipe, blender boy and handy man.

@case Would a "named character" include the bodyguards? Thank you!

@10thOfficial I would suggest no, or have their names been said in any dialogue? I feel like the "named" is exactly to draw a distinction between peripheral characters and ones relevant to the story.

@Odoacre Any idea why?

bought Ṁ20 Answer #npqAl69udq YES

@Predictor it's a bit of a meme, he always dances. Just google "Sam Rockwell..." and it will autocomplete with "dance"

bought Ṁ10 Answer #NqqOEIAZtA NO

@Odoacre called it!

@HenriThunberg

Hasn't this resolved "YES"?

@Knuffa if you're thinking about the handjob, then ChatGPT agrees with me in defining it as a no. Idk, did he also have sex with Chloe?

bought Ṁ10 Answer #PqAp6Cc2gl YES

@HenriThunberg I think both brothers had sex with Chloe. Saxon/Chloe was not shown directly but it's implied, there's a scene where they are in bed together and Chloe leaves (to get Lochlan)

Edit - Ill have a look later to find it

@HenriThunberg @Predictor I watched it again (not super carefully, was skipping bits) and I'm not so sure anymore. In the third flashback (Lochlan's) Saxon and Chloe are shown reflected in a mirror, making out. But they seem to still be dressed at that point. That's the closest I could find.

We do have Chloe's word for it, she said she "hooked up with both brothers" and that "they had a threesome". We should not trust her either way though since she will probably try to represent to Greg that she had sex with at most one brother (probably will be Saxon, since he's the one that will show up at the dinner, and also he's not in highschool, so it makes her look less creepy)

@Odoacre thanks for going out of your way. Maybe let's add it to stuff that might (unlikely though, IMO) resolve itself by him having something more clear cut later on. If he doesn't, we revisit?

bought Ṁ10 Answer #hlP56tRQ8c YES

@Odoacre oh good one Odo

bought Ṁ15 Answer #yL56NQ9t8c NO

@ukaszBartoszcze Boyfriend

sold Ṁ167 Answer #qRZI2stE2Z YES

Let’s go Fabian! I’ve been waiting for your performance!

@shankypanky this should already be resolved yes right? Chloe blackmails Saxon into coming to dinner, otherwise he would have not come

@ukaszBartoszcze No, I don't think so.

@ukaszBartoszcze ah, this was added after that episode aired so it wouldn't count. I'll add a note about the add date to make it more clear.