Resolves to YES for any number as it is passed by credible reporting.
Resolves NO for numbers that haven't been confirmed/suspected by market close February 2025.
I hope I can avoid an N/A resolution, and will go for shifty evidence, revenue numbers, indications, media guesses, despite not having 100% clear proof if that's needed.
Resolution might be less messy if I don't trade in the market, so I won't.
Update 2025-02-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Resolution Update:
The outcome will be resolved as NO unless new evidence is submitted that specifically provides a credible report on the number of copies sold.
The revenue figure provided (from the financial disclosure for The Greenwood Bible) will not be considered as evidence of copies sold.
Evidence Requirement: Only direct, credible reporting confirming the number will trigger a YES resolution.
Update 2025-08-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has stated the market will resolve to NO unless new evidence is submitted that meets a stricter standard.
Revenue figures will not be considered sufficient evidence for a YES resolution.
Only direct, credible reporting that specifically confirms the number of copies sold will be accepted.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ299 | |
| 2 | Ṁ281 | |
| 3 | Ṁ26 | |
| 4 | Ṁ19 | |
| 5 | Ṁ14 |
@HenriThunberg will resolve to this unless someone disagrees, I can't find any numbers that are relevant enough @traders
[deleted]
@HenriThunberg As long as there is enough information to place the number above 50k, this will resolve NO, right?