This market resolves to my cause(s) of death. Answers don't need to be mutually exclusive; all that are accurate will be selected. (I'll N/A duplicates or near-duplicates that serve no useful purpose.)
For any answers with an unknown truth value, whoever is resolving this market should resolve to YES any answer for which their personal credence is at least 90%, and resolve to NO all others. (Delaying resolution if it seems likely that the answer will become known within a reasonable amount of time.) If an answer is significantly ambiguous, N/A it. In the event of disagreement over these resolution criteria, the resolver should try to resolve in accordance with how they expect I would have interpreted those criteria.
It was a semi-joke answer (in reference to this), so I didn't have detailed resolution criteria in mind.
And I mean that regardless if it's a body or a simulation I don't see the reason to literally let it run until it physically can't anymore instead of leaving a .01% buffer in which you can gracefully shutdown/die of natural causes, and which probably doesn't count as freezing/running out of resources in the exact same way as uncontrollably failing because of that does.
It is safe, just a guy talking. Basically the weight and size added to the head by a helmet can potentially lead to neck/spinal cord injuries when the helmet is worn in a regular car (without a harness that professional racing drivers/cars have in addition).