Resolves YES if I find strong evidence that Tom Cruise has gone on a cruise before the end of the year. Otherwise resolves NO.
(Doesn't count any instances of Tom Cruising before market creation.)
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ235 | |
2 | Ṁ59 | |
3 | Ṁ36 | |
4 | Ṁ29 | |
5 | Ṁ25 |
@EliTyre He must have actually been on a cruise, not just have been cruising. (Otherwise any plane ride would count.)
If it's for a movie that's fine. But it has to have been a real cruise, not just a soundstage mocked up to look like one.
Justin Timberlake front property
@DavidMathers Oh, hmm. As per the title I'd say yes, but as per the description I'd say no. I failed to consider the difference between the verb "to cruise" and the much more restrictive noun "a cruise".
The title is obviously the primary purpose of this market, so I feel like I should edit the description to match it, but that would likely increase the probability a bit and seems unfair to NO traders.