Just to clarify, this would have to be a contract for an operational service, not a demonstration mission? Also, how would you handle a situation in which a contract is signed before 2030, but the system is still in development and relevant specifications like range and preparation time are not public?

@sesquipedalianThaumaturge specifications not being public doesn't concern me too much because I just can't conceive that they would go for something that fits the spirit of this market but not the criteria. Obviously will have to look at what's actually in front of us to see whether that assumption holds up. I'll just make good faith decisions if it doesn't.

A demonstrator scenario is a bit concerning. If it's clearly for a single mission or demonstrator vehicle that won't qualify, but if it's somewhat unclear (small number of vehicles, slightly speculative language in press releases, clear opportunities to cancel the contract), I'd be inclined to count it. However, this would really depend on the exact situation and I won't hem myself in now with more criteria that might end up impacting my ability to resolve in the spirit of the market.

@JoshuaWilkes I'm mostly wondering about the "under 12 hours from first notice" thing. If it's 2030 and there's a contract for an operational system, but we don't know what the designed lead time before a flight is (or it's something vague like "less than 24 hours"), how would you resolve? Or would you wait until we know how the system performs?

@sesquipedalianThaumaturge if it's something like 'less than 24 hours' or even just a vague adjective like 'rapid deployment' I'd be inclined to resolve YES because there's no real value proposition in that if it doesn't offer a step change over existing cargo jets which could do the task in roughly 24 hours