What will be true about the next woman @Krantz seriously dates?
7
Ṁ1966
2030
95%
Understands existential risk from AI.
94%
Likes finding out that she is wrong about stuff.
94%
Is insatiably curious.
90%
Open minded enough to go to contact in the dessert.
90%
Is super into taboo philosophy.
90%
Open to moral sexual deviance and drug use.
90%
Wants to have kids and teach AI how to tolerate them.
85%
Wants to live in Austin, TX.
85%
Wants to visit and explore a wide array of decentralized city projects (Zuzula, Cabin, etc).
82%
Likes to attend Lessonline and Manifest.
82%
Likes to go to burning man.
82%
Wants to help organize an 8 billion person online intellectual orgy by integrating surveys into decision markets in a way that allows sovereign individuals to mint their own nonfungible assets by interpretably defining alignment criteria.
78%
Likes to be submissive.
76%
Works in AI.
76%
Likes to listen to Danny Jones and Jesse Michels.
76%
Is into esoteric history.
71%
Is a global skeptic that only believes what she can prove.
70%
Likes to adopt dogs that need rescued.
69%
She is obsessed with mapping the logical connective structure of ever interpretable proposition that is definable.
66%
Will be less than 90% confident that 'there isn't an ontologically shocking explanation to the UFO phenomenon'.

I'm looking for a partner(s) to help build the good kind of cult that aims to take over the world with reason. I'm a sapiosexual that's much more interested in what you are curious about and your epistemic rigor than your looks, job or status.

These are the type of women that I am attracted to because of their curiosity.

https://manifold.markets/Krantz/which-females-are-you-aligned-with?r=S3JhbnR6

I'd really love to speak with @Aella.

I've got a bet about her. I've got a lot of bets..

You should read them and reach out if you're the kind of woman I'm looking for.

Whoever I date next will resolve these according to her judgment.

Get Ṁ1,000 play money
Sort by:

“intellectual orgy”???? Good lord

@JasonQ It's a paraphrase of 'social media platform that's designed to promote the collection of useful data for constructive public discourse (and alignment) by allowing sovereign individuals to print their own currency by autheticating their opinions on an open ledger (paying people to vote directly on a decentralized constitution (market)) and serving the role of open source intelligence agent (sapiosexual escort)'. Roughly.

@Krantz this is incoherent

Nahhh. At this point, I'm convinced that this is a humiliation fetish and I do not consent to being exposed to it.

@NBAP I'm not attracted to being humiliated, but I'm also not afraid of it. I don't feel humiliated right now though. I understand many of you think I ought feel that way, but right now, it just feels like you don't understand me.

If you guys want to humiliate me, maybe try writing an argument that contradicts my claims.

That would require you to understand my claims though.

@Krantz I raised objections to two of your propositions in your "Which proposition will be denied" market, though I feel we were left at an impasse.

In any case, I don't want you to be humiliated. I just think that it's insensitive (and frankly off-putting) to repeatedly and publicly express your sexual/romantic interest in a particular individual who (it seems, at this point) does not reciprocate that interest.