Marking this as improperly resolved, should have been NO. I believe it was resolved N/A due to the fix for this bug, but that shouldn't have retroactively changed the resolution criteria for existing markets that people already bet in.

@IsaacKing Eh I disagree. I don't think the resolution rules applied in this case bc you said in the market title that this market wasn't a bug from the start. So reading the title I learned I should disregard the resolution criteria.

@ian I'm going to remove the improperly resolved tag unless convinced otherwise.

@ian I think that the original description was pretty clear that invalid bugs resolved to NO, but it's not something I think is worth arguing over.

This is what I was testing. I wasn't sure at first why I was able to sell for more than I paid on a previous Manifold bug market but not any other market, so I thought it might be an issue specific to Manifold bugs.

https://manifold.markets/ManifoldBugs/liqudity-subsidies-are-still-exploi

This market is a test for another bug; it is not itself a bug report. (Sorry, people viewing this on the bug tracker.), 8k, beautiful, illustration, trending on art station, picture of the day, epic composition

View on Linear: MAN-223: This market is a test for another bug; it is not itself a bug report. (Sorry, people viewing this on the bug tracker.)