Which of these military conflicts will "turn hot" next?
โž•
Plus
92
แน€12k
resolved Jun 16
100%96%
Israel vs. Iran
0.3%
China vs. Taiwan
2%
Azerbaijan vs. Armenia
0.7%
United States vs. Iran
0.3%
Serbia vs. Kosovo
0.4%
India vs. Pakistan

Scheduled to resolve in 2030, but will resolve early as soon as one of these conflicts enters the Wars or Major Wars category on Wikipedia's List of Ongoing Armed Conflicts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_armed_conflicts

Note how Wikipedia classifies conflicts on the page, i.e. if a conflict falls short at the end of the year its relevant fatality count will reset. Otherwise, I will be fairly liberal with what counts as a conflict. So if the U.S. and Israel declare war on Iran at the same time, the question would resolve 50/50. Two belligerents fighting as part of a broader conflict with a different Wiki heading still count as long as their (para)militaries are actually fighting each other.

  • Update 2025-06-12 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator is evaluating if recent escalations, such as the direct conflict between Israel and Iran, could be interpreted as a belligerent 'actively rejoining' a broader, existing conflict.

    • If this interpretation is adopted, this could cause the broader conflict to meet the resolution criteria, even if the new escalation does not reach the 1,000-death threshold by itself.

    • The market has been temporarily closed to trading while this is discussed.

Get แน€1,000 play money

๐Ÿ… Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1แน€418
2แน€330
3แน€258
4แน€239
5แน€228
Sort by:

The recent strikes between Israel and Iran are much more deadly and sustained than their exchange last year. I think it is accurate to say that they are at war; the headlines on CNN say as much. As this was one of the "subheading" conflicts at the start of this market, it is sufficient to say that Iran is actively joined, unambiguously and directly (not just through proxies) in a hot war with Israel.

@Panfilo Would you like to weigh in on the Israel-Iran news?

Based on the simpler resolution criteria of this market compared to my later markets that clarified this situation (an already Major War-level conflict with a sub-page that escalates), I am closing the market and allowing a few days for anyone to argue this new development should or shouldn't count. Iran vs. Israel by itself is very far from 1000 deaths this calendar year, and hopefully won't come close. But if Iran is seen as "actively rejoining" the Arab-Israeli Conflict, that could be different.

Notably, last year's biggest flashpoint did not count, and there was no controversy over it not counting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_airstrike_on_the_Iranian_consulate_in_Damascus

Thoughts? @traders

Dropping this here for consideration. (I hold 1,414 YES shares on this.)

โ€”โ€”โ€”

Israel conducts airstrikes on Iran, Netanyahu says targeted nuclear program

https://ground.news/article/israel-conducts-airstrikes-on-iran-netanyahu-says-targeted-nuclear-program_3eb141?utm_source=mobile-app&utm_medium=newsroom-share

Israel's operation "will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a TV address.

-Reuters

โ€”โ€”โ€”

Iran launches retaliatory missiles into Israel, IDF announces

https://ground.news/article/iran-launches-retaliatory-missiles-into-israel-idf-announces_31cafb?utm_source=mobile-app&utm_medium=newsroom-share

I have created a (better) version of this market with more (multi-resolve) choices specifically for 2024:

Note that for Azerbaijan vs. Armenia, the annual rollover of that Wikipedia page's numbers will mean they are much less likely to be upgraded.

This is an interesting artefact of where we were 2 months ago, compared to the current Venezuela/Guyana fiasco.

What's the argument for India vs Pakistan turning hot soon?

@connorwilliams97 Kashmir has endemic fighting that Wikipedia considers an extension of that conflict, so its baseline is elevated. Also this is the first year it has increased annual deathtoll in a while.