What will this market's trading volume be? [Add answers!]
Mini
6
Ṁ13k
Oct 20
4%
In the range Pi^e^2 to e^Pi^2
0.5%
Within factor 10 of 1000 (so 100 to 10000)
20%
8! to 9! (so 40320 to 362880)
31%
Greater than this market's, at the time that this market closes: https://manifold.markets/strutheo/will-israel-declare-war-on-hezbolla
8%
10 or less away from a prime number
20%
a multiple of seven
50%
an even number
53%
> (number of traders) * 5000
99%
> (number of traders) * 1000
2%
a valid NANP phone number (with or without leading country code) that a bot/machine answers to when called
2%
a valid NANP phone number (with or without leading country code) that a human answers to when called
17%
sin(sqrt((trading volume))) > 0.8
50%
sin(sqrt((trading volume))) > 0
24%
≥Ṁ1,000,000
99%
≥Ṁ10,000
99%
≥Ṁ1,000

Resolves according to this market's trading volume at market close.

Answers that become guaranteed/impossible may resolve early.

Get Ṁ1,000 play money
Sort by:

@Robincvgr I would greatly appreciate if you would promise not to manipulate the market e.g. by vastly inflating the trading volume single-handedly

@TheAllMemeingEye Now that creator fees are gone, and I've done my best to minimize ambiguity in the answers I added, I don't see why I have much reason to act differently in this market than any other trader

@Robincvgr do you at least promise not to cheat using alt accounts?

@TheAllMemeingEye Sure, I don't even have any alt accounts

In the range Pi^e^2 to e^Pi^2

@ChristopherRandles could you clarify the order of operations here? E.g. by adding brackets

@TheAllMemeingEye
=exp(1)^pi()^2 in google docs seems to be calculated as =exp(1)^(pi()^2) = 19333.68 That is what I intended anyway.

I tried to edit in brackets but only allowed within 1 hour of creation.

@ChristopherRandles just to be clear, do I understand correctly that this is therefore pi^(e^2) < x < e^(pi^2)?

bought Ṁ76 Within factor 10 of ... NO

@TheAllMemeingEye yes that is correct.

I make the range 4715 to 19333

bought Ṁ5 > (number of traders... NO

@mods unrank please