In early 2028, will an AI be able to generate a full high-quality movie to a prompt?
➕
Plus
3.1k
Ṁ4.9m
2028
40%
chance

EG "make me a 120 minute Star Trek / Star Wars crossover". It should be more or less comparable to a big-budget studio film, although it doesn't have to pass a full Turing Test as long as it's pretty good. The AI doesn't have to be available to the public, as long as it's confirmed to exist.

Get Ṁ1,000 play money
Sort by:

not quite the crossover we asked for...

https://x.com/kimmonismus/status/1836695046424346861

bought Ṁ20 NO

I think it could be quite close. I voted no as my intuition is that it will take a little bit longer to get that level of complexity organised fast and succinctly with all the elements needed to make a high-quality AI film. Perhaps poor and 'amusing' examples will be possible for a while and then high-quality AI films from a prompt maybe in the early to mid 2030s. That's my sense personally.

would an agent-like system count for this? as in, a system that takes a prompt, writes and edits a script, and then generates lots of individual scenes and edits them into a movie?

@JoshYou you could argue if by inputting in a prompt, the LLM is able to parse it then use sub-component tools to access the scripts and modules... probably yes

@Blomfilter the question doesn't say anything about LLMs

@robm title uses the word 'prompt' which is a term frequently used when prompting language models? question body has

EG "make me a 120 minute Star Trek / Star Wars crossover".

if theres going to be dialogue present in the movie, I think a LLM will have to be present to generate it.

@JoshYou Yes it would, as long as the only input from the user was a single prompt. And nonetheless this is going to resolve NO.

Max Joe Steel has hit sitcom level... temperature rising
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNlX6AJySY8

uhoh its going to be a yes guys

bought Ṁ50 YES at 38%
bought Ṁ250 NO from 40% to 39%

Looks more like a tickle fight than a duel 😂

So if the prompt is a image complex enough that 'predict the next frame' makes a great film, does that count?

If a system like that were to exist, it would obviously be able to make a great film in response to a text prompt, so this isn't really a meaningful question.

But technically speaking, that would probably not "count". The example in this question implies a text prompt, not an image prompt. However that's pretty irrelevant to how you should bet in this market.

not a movie yet, but decent quality frame-by-frame animation from Claude

https://x.com/dyot_meet_mat/status/1828833934391792109

when ascii art slideshow is more gripping than a sitcom on fox

It's crazy that this is still so high

what does "high quality" mean to you?

This is my biggest issue as well. I think there will probably (70% chance) be an AI that can make some sort of full-length movie or TV episode in 2028. It probably won't be very impressive, but it'll be able to spit out something decent-ish, depending on your standards.

“It should be more or less comparable to a big-budget studio film, although it doesn't have to pass a full Turing Test as long as it's pretty good.”

2 traders bought Ṁ100 YES
bought Ṁ50 NO at 39%

The movie industry actually does not set a particularly high bar for continuity errors, it can probably get away with a lot outside of plot relevant continuity errors (though even sometimes that is messed up, like in Fringe where a dead character is unexplainably alive and doing things after they die, because it was an earlier season episode they couldn't fit in the first season lol) and this brings down the amount of things that need to be held in context significantly.

I expect some sort of recursive storyboarding tree potentially combined with a generated text narrative can allow expensive video models to focus on short snippets and combine them together coherently

bought Ṁ1,000 NO from 38% to 34%