@traders Now that the 100 mana play tier markets have been introduced, even with the decreased 100 mana weekly market creation bonus, there is no longer a mandatory cost for creating markets, which for me is great news :)

Rather than resolving n/a, I have decided to instead ask OpenPhil whether paying for the extra liquidity, and thus possibly improved trader number/accuracy, of higher market tiers on the same EA questions would itself be more impactful than donation.

I have extended the market a few days to allow people to alter their positions.

@TheAllMemeingEye I think adding liquidity is quite different, and you can still ask the original question, (and price of markets can still change in the future).

@dionisos true, hence I expect a lower but non negligible probability

@TheAllMemeingEye What I mean, is that you should still ask the original question (if it would be worth it for $1), or N/A (and maybe create another market for the other question).
I know there is not much mana involved so it isn't really important, but on principle I think markets should not change substantially like that.

@dionisos @traders hmm, ok sure fair enough, I'll also ask them what their answer would be if the previous situation resumes in the future, and use that for resolution, but still share their answer to the current situation

One day left before closing 🔥⏳ will prob send the email and resolve within a few days

If the markets are well written and help to get interesting information, or do some advertising for EA, and aren't too similar to other markets, I think for $1 it is worth it.
I expect the value of doing it will decrease quickly, but for now I would be on yes.

Important market 💰 📈

Conflict of interest disclaimer: this is my market