This is a long term market intended for people to be able to see at a glance people who might have high future political potential.
An answer resolves YES upon their presidential inauguration.
Resolves NO upon their death if they have not become president.
I may edit or N/A added answers for any reason, e.g. duplicates, ambiguity, insufficient fame for coverage of death, inapplicability, inappropriateness, etc.
@Tripping haha this me seeing if I can extract money from the market by selling immedietly (bur I could not sell immedietly). Sorry for polluting your market.
@Krantz For this to resolve yes, society would have to recognize that: (1) constitutions, in the form of KRANTZ, are actually artificially intelligent, (2) we could use a general decentralized constitution, in the form of KRANTZ, to control the behavior of an intelligent agent, (3) we could elect that decentralized artificially intelligent system to lead our country, and (4) we formally elect it to do so.
@jks he's inhereting a lot from his dad but definitely not his juice
@Marnix I’m not buying YES but I could see a world with Sr as his VP so Jr could be essentially an empty suit or step down immediately to enable additional Trump Sr terms.
@JasonQ Honestly I think even if they went this route they'd need someone with WAY more juice than what Jr. can bring
There are two Tulsi Gabbard entries, with different probabilities by an order of magnitude. @Tripping should one be N/A'd?