Will evidence emerge that Manifold played ANY role in the Time's 2023 POTY?
➕
Plus
58
Ṁ66k
resolved Feb 1
Resolved
NO

Reflexivity: Reflexivity is a theory that positive feedback loops between expectations and economic fundamentals can cause price trends that substantially and persistently deviate from equilibrium prices. Reflexivity's primary proponent is George Soros, who credits it with much of his success as an investor.

I think that eventually prediction markets will become important actors for the course of events, with the probabilities we create affecting the way agents behave.

If any evidence emerges that anyone at Time magazine related to the POTY used Manifold or the informations we generated were read by them, this market resolves to YES. This evidence has to come by January 2024 end.

EDIT: These informations should be related to the POTY market!

I won't bet. This market may require judgment. I'll hold a slow bar to resolve to YES.

Related market

Get Ṁ1,000 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ161
2Ṁ41
3Ṁ38
4Ṁ35
5Ṁ29
Sort by:

@MP Please resolve. Thank you!

predicted NO

resolves no

If TIME mentions the person of the year market in an article about Manifold, would that alone be enough to count, or do we need more than that?

predicted NO

@PlasmaBallin Why would that alone be enough for YES? Wouldn’t they also need to at least state that someone on staff was aware of the market before the PotY was selected?

predicted YES

@JimHays The criteria as written are very broad, that's why:

If any evidence emerges that anyone at Time magazine related to the POTY used Manifold or the informations we generated were read by them, this market resolves to YES.

@JimHays I agree that it shouldn't be sufficient, but the description makes it sound like it is.

I vote for a version of this for 2024 too, etc. promise to bet

Done

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I'm MAAAAAAANIFFFESSSSTIIIIIIIIIINGGGGG OOOHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAA

"If any evidence emerges that anyone at Time magazine related to the POTY used Manifold or the informations we generated were read by them"

This seems very broad. Can this resolve on something like a TIME editor liking a tweet?

predicted YES

Or what if an editor edits an article that has Manifold in it?

@Joshua only if that's a tweet about POTY.

@Joshua added a clarification

So, what if a TIME article is mostly about manifold.love, but it happens to mention that we have person of the year markets. Can we assume that it was edited by a TIME editor, and that the TIME editors are involved in the POTY selection? Or would we need to know the specific person who edited the article, and whether that person is specifically on the team that makes the choice?

@Joshua Yes, we can use assumptions. As said, a lower standard for resolution. I'll just assume anything posted at the TIME magazine is read by the TIME magazine POTY committee or whatever

@MP Hmmmm yeah I think if the TIME article happens, there's a decent chance they mention that we have markets about the person of the year. And currently looks like a 57% that the article happens.