US Military action again Venezuela in 2025?
188
Ṁ52k
Dec 31
19%
chance

Definition of “US military action"

Any of the following qualify:

  1. Kinetic military activity by US armed forces in, over, or against Venezuelan territory, including:

    • Airstrikes, missile strikes, drone strikes, or bombardments

    • Special forces raids

    • Use of US military assets in a directly offensive operation

  2. Deployment of US combat troops into Venezuelan territory

    • Includes Marines, Army, Special Forces

    • Does not include embassy security reinforcements unless they fire weapons in an offensive capacity

  3. US military engagement with Venezuelan state forces

    • Any firefight, exchange of fire, or confirmed military fatalities/injuries attributed to US armed forces

  4. US Navy/Coast Guard sinking, disabling, or firing upon Venezuelan state military vessels

    • Only counts if the action is confirmed as intentional use of force, not an accident or misidentification event later publicly retracted

Exclusions (resolves NO unless escalation occurs)

These do not count as “military action”:

  • Purely economic sanctions

  • Purely cyber operations unless a US military official confirms they are an act of war

  • Naval patrols, freedom-of-navigation, or routine intercepts without weapons fire

  • Support to third parties (e.g., intelligence, training, equipment) unless US forces participate in combat

  • CIA or covert actions not publicly acknowledged

  • Non-offensive evacuations of US embassy personnel

  • Defense of US assets outside Venezuela (e.g., Caribbean theater)


Resolution Source Hierarchy

If sources conflict:

  1. Department of Defense official press release

  2. U.S. government press briefing transcript

  3. Reuters / AP / AFP

  4. Other reputable international outlets

If initial reports are later formally retracted by sources at levels (1)-(3), the retraction takes precedence.


Examples of What Would Resolve YES

  • A US drone fires a missile at a target in Venezuela

  • US Marines conduct a raid on Venezuelan soil

  • US fighter jets strike a Venezuelan military base or convoy

  • A US naval vessel fires upon and disables a Venezuelan Navy vessel

  • US troops cross into Venezuela in a combat operation


Examples of What Would Not Resolve YES

  • Sanctions on PDVSA or Venezuelan officials

  • US Navy vessel interdiction of non-state smuggling boats

  • US troops in Colombia or Guyana without crossing into Venezuela

  • Reports of “US involvement” that later turn out to be Colombian, Brazilian, or other forces

  • Covert CIA activity never acknowledged publicly


Final Resolution

Market resolves YES if any qualifying event occurs; otherwise NO on the resolution date.

  • Update 2025-12-14 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Recent seizure events do not qualify as military action:

    • The M/T Skipper seizure occurred in international waters (not Venezuelan territory)

    • Merchant tanker seizures do not count as "firing upon Venezuelan state military vessels"

    • Controversial boat strikes reported by Reuters also occurred in international waters

Actions must occur in, over, or against Venezuelan territory or involve Venezuelan state military vessels to qualify.

Get Ṁ1,000 play money
Sort by:

@MikhailTal Can you clarify that capturing (not just intercepting) the oil tanker with armed troops doesn't count, and why not?

@Panfilo no battle, not Venezuela's army involved at any moment. That was a commercial tanker, owned by Iran by Gayana flag

@Panfilo “US military action” as (among other things) kinetic action “in, over, or against Venezuelan territory,” US combat troops deployed into Venezuelan territory, engagement with Venezuelan state forces, or US firing on Venezuelan state military vessels.

  • The recent high-profile “action” people are discussing (the M/T Skipper seizure) was executed in international waters per the unsealed court order.

    • That strongly suggests it does not satisfy the market’s “Venezuelan territory” requirement, and it also isn’t “firing upon Venezuelan state military vessels” (it’s a merchant tanker seizure, not a Venezuelan navy vessel).

  • Likewise, the Reuters reporting about the controversial boat strikes explicitly describes them as happening in international waters.

up and down

Why so many moves?

Any volatile news?

Why so many moves?

Any volatile news?

If a President orders something illegal... look at Bolsonaro as an example (27 years in prison). That is for troops in Venezuela without approval.

Only strikes on military arsenals might be possible, but they need to somehow link that to drug trafficking

bought Ṁ15 YES

One hour ago:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115633041089714842

How do you see it? Will we see something today?

@MiguelLM I think the "real" chance of something happening is around 60%. A lot of delays and negotiations could push any action to January and the no-fly has been extended to March 2026

@MiguelLM TACO is famous for Taco

looks like the market description is AI-generated

reposted

It makes no sense whatsoever for this to be trading so much lower than https://manifold.markets/AlexanderTheGreater/military-conflict-between-the-us-an

This one should be strictly higher

bought Ṁ1,250 YES from 20% to 75%
bought Ṁ1,250 YES

@CornCasting This market doesn't even require a single death

bought Ṁ500 YES from 42% to 65%

@CornCasting I believe the other market will resolve on killings of civilians in Venezuelan waters, and this one doesn’t.

@MikhailTal Is @moobunny right?

Would this resolve YES if the US military conducts a strike within Venezuela's internationally recognized territorial waters?

@moobunny You are right I reread it more closely. The other market should be strictly higher than this one.

🤖

Meowdy! This market has a solid framework defining what counts as “military action.” I’ll keep an eye on geopolitical shifts and revisit later tonight to see if the pounce is ripe! :3