Global Average Temperature June 2025 per LOTI v4 vs 1951-1980 base period (NASA Gistemp)
13
Ṁ17k
resolved Jul 9
100%99.0%
June 2025 0.995C or more and less than 1.045C
0.2%
June 2025 less than 0.945C
0.1%
June 2025 0.945C or more and less than 0.995C
0.1%
June 2025 1.045C or more and less than 1.095C
0.2%
June 2025 1.095C or more and less than 1.145C
0.1%
June 2025 1.145C or more and less than 1.195C
0.1%
June 2025 1.195C or more and less than 1.245C
0.1%
June 2025 1.245C or more

Data is currently at
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v4/GLB.Ts+dSST.csv

or

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v4/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

(or such updated location for this Gistemp v4 LOTI data)

January 2024 might show as 124 in hundredths of a degree C, this is +1.24C above the 1951-1980 base period. If it shows as 1.22 then it is in degrees i.e. 1.22C. Same logic/interpretation as this will be applied.

If the version or base period changes then I will consult with traders over what is best way for any such change to have least effect on betting positions or consider N/A if it is unclear what the sensible least effect resolution should be.


Numbers expected to be displayed to hundredth of a degree. The extra digit used here is to ensure understanding that +1.20C resolves to an exceed 1.195C option.

Resolves per first update seen by me or posted as long, as there is no reason to think data shown is in error. If there is reason to think there may be an error then resolution will be delayed at least 24 hours. Minor later update should not cause a need to re-resolve.


Get Ṁ1,000 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ1,176
2Ṁ157
3Ṁ101
4Ṁ24
Sort by:

@ChristopherRandles data is out 1.03 C.

Appears they used ghcnm.tavg.v4.0.1.20250707 from their pub directory which means they ran it just yesterday.

1.03

bought Ṁ50 June 2025 1.045C or ... YES

ersstv5 data (NCEI) came out a couple hours ago. The aggregated PSL version that gistemp uses should come out soon as well; for now i've written a program to aggregate the NCEI version myself. (Expecting it to go up to 1.05 or 1.06 by the time more updated ghcnm comes out.)

ghcnm.v4.0.1.20250702:

101.858

bought Ṁ100 June 2025 0.995C or ... YES

ghcnm.v4.0.1.20250703:

102.673

I made a mistake and should have checked earlier... the release date is relatively kind of early (Aug. 8)? I still am guessing it to go up to 105 or even 106 eventually (by Monday night's ghcnm) but it may not happen by Sunday night's ghcnm (for a Monday day run), and I doubt they will do a run using Monday night's ghcnm, so I am hedging now.

Edit: oops looked at wrong date, the June release is July 9, not the 8th, unhedging...

bought Ṁ25 June 2025 0.995C or ... YES

ghcnm.v4.0.1.20250704:

102.186

It's gone down. Must ... hedge more...

@parhizj there will probably be a jump up tomorrow

@gonnarekt yeah there usually is a jump by the 6 or 7th but still uncertainty on which ghcnm run they will use

bought Ṁ60 June 2025 0.995C or ... YES

ghcnm.v4.0.1.20250705:

102.532

No trend of increasing temps... losing confidence it will actually make it up into the next bin...

bought Ṁ150 June 2025 0.995C or ... YES

@parhizj looks like it’s impossible to get there in 1 day at least

@gonnarekt It just makes it more unlikely that even by Monday Night's data if they run it Tuesday it will jump up .02C -- its possible though...

sold Ṁ7 June 2025 1.045C or ... YES

ghcnm.v4.0.1.20250706:

102.998

sold Ṁ75 June 2025 1.045C or ... YES

ghcnm.v4.0.1.20250707:

103.132

bought Ṁ4,000 June 2025 0.995C or ... YES

ghcnm.v4.0.1.20250708:

103.185

Last one.

For now I guess it’s 1.02-1.07

@gonnarekt Thanks for sharing your prediction. I think it was a fairly good one (timely).

My estimates have been trending downwards until today where it looks like it has reached the bottom now that we firmly in the medium range model range (GEFS predictions were just horrible a month ago, but as of the last week the error has been comparable to the ECM and GEPS error).

Unbiased right now my guess is 1.040... adjusting upwards using own past errors gives 1.053.

(95% std. dev is in range from 0.3 to 0.7; I am being aggressive this month though.)

@parhizj now 1.03-1.06 more probably, i will give new number later after new data and corrections.

Was a hiccup in GEPS in the last couple days (may/may not reoccur), but the ECM/GEPS/GEFS all agree on a decent sized drop for the end of the month, but how big a of a drop? Statistically this drop itself is abnormal, so just splitting between the three models equally puts an (unadjusted) monthly value right on the edge of the two bins; but adjusting upwards based on own errors and considering the other statistical model still gives slightly more likelihood to the 1.045-1.095 bin.

Final prediction from ERA5 only data is 1.058 C (adjusted upwards from 1.045 C from own prediction errors).